Truth Cures

The Western societies are too wrapped up in the arrogance of their “modern medicine”, to realize that they really could be champions of world health, if they would open their eyes. For example, if just ten percent of the billions that are dumped into research for drug based cures to cancer were to be applied to researching the existing claims of cancer cures, cancer would be a commonly cured “illness”, rather than a disease.  Multiple research doctors from multiple countries now agree that cancer is caused by the candida fungus.  We will discuss this and the discovered mechanics of it in length in many future articles.  The general cure is as simple as changing one’s internal pH and venous oxygen saturation levels, which is also the preventative steps.  Of course, each case is different in location within the body and severity of the infection, but the cure is the same – just applied differently for each situation.  There are many natural ways to fight cancer, with high success rates.  Back to reality: the modern medical industry does not want to cure cancer because that would not be profitable.

Here we are at the conclusion of this multi-part article and I need to finish with the question that each one of you must answer if you are considering applying the scientific backed true cures that will be discussed on this site.  If natural medicine has been around from the beginning of humankind, and conventional medicine only the past 50 to 80 years; and conventional medicine cannot cure diseases that natural medicine can; and conventional drugs can cause more harm than good while at the same time not curing but maintaining an illness … which school of medical thought is really the “alternative” medicine?

I personally believe that conventional medicine is the alternative, and not a very good one at that.

Regarding the terms “conventional” and “alternative”, I asked two questions in Part 1, the second being, “Who decided what the definitions would be and who would have the authority to categorize between the two all treatments, ideas, and areas of research?”  Therefore, we find that the modern medical professionals say that any treatment that they do not say is “conventional”, is automatically “alternative”, and who is it that gave them the authority to make those distinctions? They are self-appointed and approved of by the other self-appointed doctors that are all defenders of what they consider, “true medicine”.  It is a club, a clique, an amorphous group that has no clear definition, only that the members of it know when someone else does not belong in their group.  That is when the outsider gets the label, regardless of their education, intelligence, or achievements – “alternative”.  But let us consider whom it is that has more education, and required hours application before receiving their degree. It is a known fact that can be easily searched out by anyone with a computer that the M.D. / D.O. degrees are first professional degrees and not doctorates of research (i.e., Ph.D.).  Most of the doctors who have performed research into the science and understanding of natural medicine have earned the more advanced doctorate of research (Ph.D.). Why is it then, that they are treated as inferior in their thinking and scientific understanding?  Why is it the consensus among doctors with only M.D. or D.O. degrees that those research doctors are not practicing “true medicine”, when in fact those researchers, for the large part, are more educated in the medical sciences?

Now, what I am about to say is not intended to sound like a conspiracy theory or to apply to all D.O.s, but it does come from an acquaintance of mine who is a chiropractor with 30 years of experience.  As a matter of fact, he has agreed to write some guest articles on some really interesting topics, one of which is the now known cause and cure for SIDS.  Did you hear that, for SIDS!  How many of you have heard about that on the news?  Most likely, no one has heard about the SIDS cure on the news because it is simple and natural and will not make anyone any real money of note.  This doctor friend of mine was telling me that a D.O. has some chiropractic training and can adjust patients or perform surgery on them.  He also was telling me that he is able to heal scoliosis in patients, even severe, in just two to three months with adjustment techniques. He only recommends surgery to fuse vertebrae or install rods in less than 5% of patients. He said that in speaking with a D.O. friend of his that he had not seen in a while, he learned that his friend hardly ever performed adjustments on patients anymore. The reason was that the revenue from an adjustment is only about $35, but for a vertebrae fusion it is about $10,000.  So the choice was made to make a lot of money in only a few hours at the expense of the patient, whom would have permanent limitations to their mobility; rather than make a lot less money, and spend more time treating the patient and have the patient fully recover and have full mobility.  I am positive that the doctor we are speaking of is not the only one to take this path – so much for the oath to “never do harm”.  This is why I am saying that the medical industry is broken and corrupt, because what is best for the patients, for people, for moms, dads, daughters and sons, is not the motivation anymore – at least not in modern, conventional medicine.  I am not suggesting that all doctors are not looking out for the patient, I am sure that most of them are; however, the industry behind the doctors, and some of the doctors put the money first.

I do not believe that a cure for cancer, Alzheimer’s, arthritis, lupus, or any other major disease that currently plagues us will come from conventional medical sources.  The fact is, as we will begin discussing in future posts, there cures already exist to all of those diseases that I just listed.  The cures are natural, non-surgical, non-evasive, have many testimonies backing them, have scientific research backing and explaining them, and yet most of you reading this have never heard of this and some of you think I am about to sell you some snake oil.  First of all, do not expect any for-profit drug company to come up with any cures.  They are businesses.  They are structured to make money, not put themselves out of business by finding a cure to a disease that makes them billions of dollars in revenues from selling maintenance drugs.  Secondly, do not expect a cure to come from the surgeons, because they are trained to remove, repair, and clean out, but those actions are not “cures”, especially to diseases that spread or affect the whole body.  Who then in conventional medicine is going to find cures, true cures?

Here is a brief example of what I was speaking about in Part 3: Hydrogen peroxide has many amazing healing properties and applications, including curing cancer, which we will examine in-depth in future posts. During an interview with the head of one of the top three pharmaceutical companies in the US, the interviewer asked about the company’s knowledge of the healing power of hydrogen peroxide.  The response was, “We know about hydrogen peroxide, but, frankly speaking, we are a profit motivated company and there is no profit in hydrogen peroxide.” (McCabe, O2xygen Therapies: A New Way of Approaching Disease, page 56.)  Which is more profitable to the medical industry, a person cured of cancer naturally with a couple hundred dollars of investment and some patience, or a person suffering for years having many procedures, radiation treatments, chemotherapy, surgical removals, drug treatments, hospitals stays, relapses, and maybe even a prosthetic?  Who profits? Receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars from one protracted battle with cancer, those who profit are the hospital, various doctors, drug companies, equipment manufacturers, tool manufacturers, laundry companies, bio-waste disposal companies, even billing companies, and many more.  Which scenario is more profitable to humankind? As I asserted, the modern medical industry is broken and corrupt.

Modern medicine, as I wrote in Part 1 of this series, has continually moved away from naturally occurring treatments and put more and more emphasis on man-made drugs, surgical procedures, and other high-tech remedies, such as radiation.  We all know it is an ongoing joke that is played out in movies, spoofs, magazine, and daily conversations about the drug industry and how a certain drug helps with one or two areas, but has such horrible side effects that often cause problems in many other areas.  I am not anti-modern medicine, but let me be blunt – the modern medical industry is a broken and corrupt entity.  Now, I am not saying that I do not use or benefit from time to time from the discoveries, products, or procedures of it, I do.  I am meaning that it is no longer driven by the welfare of humankind, but rather the pursuit of financial profit.  I am not maligning the doctors that fill our emergency rooms, take care of our children, or those who are striving so hard to discover cures for diseases in the best manner in which they have been taught.  I am not speaking about the countless nurses who wade through blood, vomit, and excrement to help those who are ailing.  I am referring to the industry and the driving force behind research and treatment development.

Previously, I left you with two questions to ponder, one of which was, “In the span of time and the history of humankind, which medicine is ‘conventional’ and which medicine is ‘alternative’?” I like to use the phrase, “natural medicine”, for the type of treatments and research discoveries we will be highlighting on this site.  Please do not confuse my phrase with Naturopathy, or Naturopathic Medicine, which is based on a belief in vitalism, which theorizes that a unique energy called “vital energy” or “vital force” guides bodily processes, including those related to healing and physiological balance.  I am not saying that there is, or is not, any validity to Naturopathy, so those of you who subscribe to that belief, please do not misunderstand my intention.  As I have written before, this site will discuss, highlight, and publicize treatments and discoveries that are backed by either scientific study, or a long history of testimonies of effectiveness supported by related scientific study.

I prefer the term natural medicine because I believe that the body and nature where made to interact.  Natural medicine is not hocus pocus, but rather understanding what is natural to the human body and that it was designed to live in and receive strength from things found in nature.  Regardless of what type of faith or belief a person has, everyone agrees that the human body was designed to live in harmony with nature. So why are most human bodies not, especially in Western societies?  So looking to nature, the resources that are naturally occurring, the study of mechanisms and processes in nature that benefit other creatures, and to the study of history and how man survived disease and injury in various cultures since ancient times are all lend to the discoveries of natural medicine. These reveal ancient truths in the light of modern scientific research, with the ability to extract the “why” out the success of some treatment from ancient times or undeveloped cultures. For the Western world to embrace natural medicine, scientific research must discover the mechanisms and interactions with the human body that cause the nature based treatments or remedies to be successful.